Tuesday, April 7, 2015

PB1B Inspecting Genre Generators

            A genre is anything with a specific pattern to it.   In order to have a genre, that genre must have multiple conventions that apply to it and make it what it is.  When I experimented with genre generators, I learned that each image, or text generated was following a specific set of guidelines, creating all pieces of work under the same category.  I also realized that online genre generators would be a great way to explain genre to someone who doesn’t know what it is because you quickly realize that the generators are using s set of conventions to generate a new image. 
As I experimented with the comic strip genre generator, I began to notice the conventions used to generate the new images.  In all of the generated comics were pictures, and most with words. Usually the words were used in dialogue by the characters.  Another similarity was they almost all were making a joke or used sarcasm.  Whether a character said something sarcastic, or something bad happened to a character, almost all used this mechanism. They appeared to be hand drawn images and were displayed in sequence boxes, guiding you along the story.  All of these are examples of conventions used by the comic strip generator in order to generate a piece of work in the same genre.
            Looking at the meme generator, many conventions were also used in order to get a correct output.  All of the memes were pictures with captions on them.  They also all were making a joke or using sarcasm.  Another convention that applied to most generated memes was they were usually an image of a person or animal doing, or saying something stupid.  The wording on all of the memes was minimal, but to the point.  The images shown were not people looking nice or serious, but usually a goofy looking man or woman.  This list of conventions all put together makes up the genre of a meme
            The last genre generator was called SCIgen.  It was an interesting genre generator because it didn’t generate a popular genre such as a “comic strip” or “meme.” What SCIgen generated was a completely random paper report.  Although the report seemed extremely random, the genre generator was following and using a set of conventions.  Something they all had in common was they all had an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.  They also all wrote your input words under the title of the report.  Every report also had a few graphs and charts used among the text.  Lastly, another convention was it ended with a long page of references.  I was surprised to see what I thought was random gibberish actually had conventions making up an actual genre.
            As I experimented with three genre generator websites, I began to understand how this might be able to help something who doesn’t understand genre, to understand.  If someone had no idea what genre was, and you asked them to sit down and experiment with these websites, they would hopefully begin to ask what makes these “memes” or “comic strips” what they are.  By using a generator, it would be easier to explain that all the images that are generated has a list of things, called conventions, that categorize them into that genre.   Simply asking a person to list the similarities between the generated “comic strips” would allow them to think about the rules, or conventions of that genre, and they would better understand. 
           
            Genre at first seems like an easy term to understand, but when applied to writing can be misunderstood.  Every genres list of conventions makes clear what that genre really is.  The genre generators were a great way to better understand genre, and what makes it its own genre.  

3 comments:

  1. Your project builder on the three genre generators was very intriguing and helpful. The way you structured your ideas and views on each genre made the paper fluid and easy to follow. The conventions you believed each genre had were accurate and consistent with what appeared from the generator. I believe that you could have mentioned some of the rhetorical features like the audience, tone, or context of the genre in order to explain why the generator created the genre in that sort of way. I felt that if you did add a little context, it would have made your paper stronger and more than just a list of conventions. All in all your paper was great and insightful. I liked how you explain the façade of genre being at first an easy topic, but in reality a tricky and important term that we need to know in order to better our writing and ourselves. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Trabucco,

    Your bio: A SB native, huh? Very cool! (By the way, the aesthetic of your blog is tremendous. Part artsy, part island-y.)

    PB1A: I agree with Brandon that this was an outside-the-box pick. Nice going on that front. I also agree that, yeah, the advice column usually includes anonymous posters (with the “clever” names) that start out with their question. As you mention, restrictions/decency and the nature of a publication being public/private also play a role in identifying this genre within its fullest context. Excellent work on this.

    PB1B: A little bit more evidence from the generated comic strips could have, I think, strengthened your claims. Where did you spot sarcasm? What was the style/substance of the words that you made you think it was a joke? Getting into the rhetorical features too—audience, purpose, tone, context—could have been another way to elaborate on this entry a bit more.

    Make sure you’re looking super-close at all the nitty/gritty details. You also missed an opportunity to dig into the pop culture-y nature of memes (and who that might appeal to) as well as the setup/punchline (top/bottom) way that it’s usually formatted.

    Grade for both PBs: 4.5/5
    PB1A: “Check/ check plus.”
    PB1B: “Check/check minus.”

    Z

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that the way you started you blog was pretty good. I liked how you defined the term ‘genre’ and mentioned that genre must have multiple conventions. This is very true. The way you also introduced the genre generators you experimented was well written. You did mention that the genre generators were a great way for someone to learn about genres if they do not fully know what they are. While reading the rest of your blog, I am seeing that you did have some fun while experimenting with these generators and I am noticing that you too are learning more about the importance of genres. I liked how your conclusion restated your introduction and added a little more analysis on your genre generator experiments. Overall, I think you did a great job with this blog, it was elaborate, informative, and it should help readers learn a little bit more about the use of genres.

    ReplyDelete